If police have accused you of violating California Penal Code § 29800, better known as the felon in possession of a firearm statute, you already know how quickly a routine traffic stop or a knock-and-talk can explode into the threat of years behind bars. 29800 is often called an “umbrella” prohibition because it bars anyone convicted of a felony, certain violent misdemeanors, or addicted to a narcotic drug from owning, purchasing, receiving, or exercising custody or control over any firearm in the state of California. The DA will argue that simply having a revolver in your nightstand, a hunting rifle in the garage, or even a disassembled pistol in a friend’s trunk satisfies possession of a firearm.Our firm defends these cases daily. We know the technical defenses that win suppressions, the diversion programs that salvage careers, and the post-conviction remedies, such as a certificate of rehabilitation, that can restore limited gun rights. When your freedom is on the line, you need lawyers who have persuaded juries that a “felon in possession” was actually a roommate’s weapon, convinced judges to toss evidence from an unlawful search and seizure, and negotiated dismissals when the accused showed only momentary possession while disarming a violent attacker. We are those lawyers, and we are ready to stand between you and the state.
The key language of PC 29800(a)(1) reads:“Any person who has been convicted of a felony offense anywhere or has two or more convictions for certain violent misdemeanors, or who is addicted to the use of any narcotic drug, and who owns, purchases, receives, or has in possession or under custody or control any firearm is guilty of a felony.”In plain terms, the possession of a firearm law criminalizes mere access; the pistol need not be loaded or used.Legislators drafted the statute broadly to capture every conceivable form of ownership or control. A “firearm” includes antique revolvers, semiautomatic pistols, short-barreled rifles, shotguns, homemade “ghost guns,” and even a single-shot signal flare gun if it can fire conventional ammunition. This sweeping definition means defendants are often surprised to learn that an old heirloom or a non-functioning collectible still triggers liability under 29800 PC. Similarly, “addicted to narcotics” does not require a current arrest for drug possession; a doctor’s notation in medical files or statements made during a probation interview may give prosecutors the evidence they need.
The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that:
Each element is a separate battlefield. We often focus on the “knowledge” prong, demonstrating that the weapon was hidden, newly placed, or found in a shared area, leaving the DA short of proof that the defendant truly realized the gun existed.
Physical contact is not required; prosecutors love constructive-possession theories because they broaden the reach of the code section. Yet ambiguity abounds: Was the closet locked? Did others have equal access? Our cross-examination exposes these uncertainties.
Expect the state to rely on fingerprints, DNA swabs, jail calls, or social-media photos flaunting weapons. We counter with evidence of contamination, alternate explanations, and expert testimony on secondary DNA transfer.
Judges can also impose formal probation, search conditions, and mandatory counseling. Out-of-state convictions mean federal courts may later designate you an “armed career criminal,” enhancing any future sentence.
A new conviction restarts the ten-year California firearms ban clock and cements the lifetime federal prohibition. It also complicates immigration petitions, professional licenses, and future certificate of rehabilitation efforts. Employers increasingly run live-scan background checks; another felony can derail job offers in security, transportation, or healthcare.
If you briefly possessed the gun solely to prevent imminent danger and took steps to rid yourself of it (e.g., handing it to police), you qualify for the “justifiable possession of a firearm” exception. Courts look at duration, motive, and whether you notified authorities without unnecessary delay.
We file Penal Code § 1538.5 motions when officers rummage through drawers without consent or a warrant. Suppressing the gun ends the case. Body-cam gaps, conflicting search-warrant affidavits, or stale probable cause often swing rulings in our favor.
Perhaps a friend stashed the pistol under your car seat without notice. Prosecutors must prove you knew the weapon was there; lack of knowledge sows reasonable doubt. Sometimes the state relies on possession of gun-related accessories; we argue these items do not automatically equal firearm awareness.
Co-occupants sometimes blame clients to dodge their own liability. We use forensic testing, texts, and CCTV to show that someone else possessed the firearm. In multi-defendant cases, we push for separate trials to prevent guilt by association.
A felon in possession arrest is not the same as a conviction. With our California criminal defense attorneys at your side, you may be able to petition the court for diversion, get the charge reduced to a non-gun misdemeanor, or win outright dismissal. Call us now for a free at (909) 340-2000, confidential case review because under California Penal Code § 29800, the stakes are life-changing, but so is the power of a strategic defense.
This page was written, edited, reviewed, and approved by Bobby Shamuilian.
Attorney Shamuilian is the managing partner and founder of My Rights Law and is widely recognized as a legal authority, frequently appearing as a legal analyst and TV pundit on national news outlets.
He has earned a perfect “10.0 – Top Attorney” rating on AVVO and a “10.0” rating on Justia, and has been named among the “Top 40 Under 40” and the “Top 100 Trial Lawyers” by The National Trial Lawyers.
With his proven expertise and dedication, Mr. Shamuilian is committed to protecting your rights and achieving the best possible outcome for your case.
The last modified date shows when this page was most recently reviewed.
schedule a free confidential consultation
