White logo with a stylized column and the text "MYRIGHTS LAW" followed by smaller, blurry words on a light background.Logo for MyRights.Law featuring a stylized pillar and text that reads

Lifting Liberty

Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Primary Item (H2)
A man with a beard wearing a suit and tie is shown in a circular portrait with a blurred background.

Managing Partner and Founding Attorney

My Rights Law Criminal Defense and DUI Lawyers

A bold, black uppercase letter "A" on a light, slightly textured background.
Published date: April 5, 2013

Prior to September 9, 2010, the law in California dictated that if an individual had once been convicted of any theft offense, and had served at least a day in jail, any subsequent convictions for petty theft could be prosecuted as a felony, rather than a misdemeanor. The pertinent statute, California Penal Code Section 666, “Petty Theft with a Prior.”

However, On September 9, 2010, former California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed Assembly Bill 1844, which drastically changed how countless petty theft crimes are charged in California. Specifically, under the new law, the petty theft with a prior statute cannot be alleged unless the accused has been convicted of a theft related offense three or more times (at least one of which included jail time).

There is, however, one important exception. This exception provides that only one prior theft conviction is required if the defendant is a registered sex offender (pursuant to California Penal Code Section 290), or if he or she has a prior conviction for a serious or violent felony (i.e., a “strike” under California law pursuant to California Penal Code Section 667.5).

This legislation signifies an ever-increasing trend in how California lawmakers have approached criminal sentencing, in the process making a critical distinction between violent and non-violent offenders.

The message delivered under this approach has generally been clear and to the point: violent offenders need to be locked up; non-violent offenders typically deserve multiple chances at rehabilitation before spending a significant amount of time behind bars.

The exact language of AB 1844 and the subsequent amended reading of C.P.C 666 are as follows:

“ SEC . 15. Section 666 of the Penal Code is amended to read: 666 (a) Notwithstanding Section 490, every person who, having been convicted three or more times of petty theft, grand theft, auto theft under Section 10851 of the Vehicle Code, burglary, carjacking, robbery, or a felony violation of Section 496 and having served a term therefor in any penal institution or having been imprisoned therein as a condition of probation for that offense, is subsequently convicted of petty theft, then the person convicted of that subsequent offense is punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison.

(b) Notwithstanding Section 490, any person described in paragraph (1) who, having been convicted of petty theft, grand theft, auto theft under Section 10851 of the Vehicle Code, burglary, carjacking, robbery, or a felony violation of Section 496, and having served a term of imprisonment therefor in any penal institution or having been imprisoned therein as a condition of probation for that offense, who is subsequently convicted of petty theft, is punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison.

(1) This subdivision shall apply to any person who is required to register pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act, or who has a prior violent or serious felony conviction, as specified in subdivision (c) of Section 667.5 or subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7.
(2) This subdivision shall not be construed to preclude prosecution or punishment pursuant to subdivisions (b) to (i), inclusive, of Section 667, or Section 1170.12.”

This page was written, edited, reviewed, and approved by Bobby Shamuilian.

Attorney Shamuilian is the managing partner and founder of My Rights Law and is widely recognized as a legal authority, frequently appearing as a legal analyst and TV pundit on national news outlets.

He has earned a perfect “10.0 – Top Attorney” rating on AVVO and a “10.0” rating on Justia, and has been named among the “Top 40 Under 40” and the “Top 100 Trial Lawyers” by The National Trial Lawyers.

With his proven expertise and dedication, Mr. Shamuilian is committed to protecting your rights and achieving the best possible outcome for your case.

The last modified date shows when this page was most recently reviewed.

schedule a free confidential consultation

crosschevron-down
English