Riverside Kickback and Patient Referral Fraud Lawyer

Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Primary Item (H2)
Last updated: August 24, 2026

Kickback and Patient Referral Defense in Riverside

My Rights Law criminal defense attorney Bobby Shamuilian

Almost every significant healthcare fraud prosecution in the Riverside area has a referral arrangement somewhere in the file. A marketer paid per patient. A facility director who gets a monthly stipend. A doctor whose “consulting” checks track admissions. Prosecutors call it remuneration; the people involved usually called it marketing. My Rights Law Criminal Defense and DUI Lawyers defends Riverside providers, clinic owners, and marketers accused of paying or receiving kickbacks for patient referrals — called patient brokering or body brokering when it involves recruiting people themselves. This page explains the statutes, the safe harbors, and how these cases are actually defended.

We fight aggressively to get charges reduced or dismissed.
Schedule A free confidential Consultation

The Statutes Behind Referral Cases

Two systems criminalize referral payments. Federally, the Anti-Kickback Statute — 42 U.S.C. section 1320a-7b — makes it a felony to knowingly and willfully pay or receive remuneration in return for referring federal healthcare program business, or to induce purchases of items or services covered by those programs. In California, Business and Professions Code section 650 makes it unlawful for a licensee to pay or receive anything of value for referring patients, prospective patients, or clients, with parallel felony provisions in Penal Code section 550.2 for insurance-funded care. The same contract can violate all of them at once.

What Counts as Remuneration

Remuneration is anything of value, and it is rarely just cash:

  • per-admission or per-visit marketing fees;
  • free or below-market rent for clinic space;
  • excessive “medical director” salaries not tied to real duties;
  • guaranteed salaries or bonuses that vary with referrals;
  • free staffing, supplies, or equipment for a referral source;
  • loan forgiveness, investments, or equity stakes tied to patient flow;
  • gift cards, event tickets, travel, and vendor-sponsored perks.

What distinguishes a lawful arrangement from a crime is not the label on the contract — it is whether payment tracks referral volume or value, and whether the arrangement fits within regulatory safe harbors.

Safe Harbors and Why They Matter

The Anti-Kickback Statute is drafted broadly, and Congress directed HHS to publish safe harbors — regulatory specifications that, if met, protect an arrangement. Investment interests, rental agreements, personal services contracts, and employee compensation all have safe harbors with strict requirements: fair market value, commercial reasonableness, and — critically — payment that does not vary with the volume or value of referrals. Arrangements outside a safe harbor are not automatically illegal; they are judged on intent. That intent analysis is the battleground of every kickback case.

Experience. Strategy. Results
Get the defense you deserve.

How Kickback Cases Get Built in Riverside County

Federal referrals surface through audits, data analysis, former employees, and the government’s growing use of data matching between payer records and marketing contracts. Wire charges often attach because payments move by check or transfer. Once one party cooperates, the referral chain — marketer, clinic, physician — is charged together. State Medi-Cal versions are prosecuted by DMFEA and filed at the Riverside County Superior Court’s Riverside Hall of Justice at 4100 Main Street; federal kickback cases go to the Central District of California. Convictions carry prison, exclusion from Medicare and Medi-Cal, and board discipline.

Defenses in Referral and Brokering Cases

  • compensation was fair market value for genuine, documented services;
  • payments did not vary with referral volume or value;
  • the defendant lacked knowledge the arrangement was unlawful — the statute requires knowing and willful conduct;
  • no federal or state program business was actually involved;
  • the arrangement predates or postdates the charged period;
  • witnesses cooperating against the defendant have motives that impeachment exposes;
  • text messages and emails, read in full context, show a lawful purpose.

The one-time purchase statute — 42 U.S.C. section 1320a-7b(b) — also contains exceptions for certain isolated transactions, and state law has its own exceptions for specified employment and billing structures. Whether any exception fits is a legal question that should be analyzed before, not after, charges.

The best defense starts early.

Get help now for your Riverside referral or kickback case

Schedule A free confidential Consultation

Related Riverside Defense Resources

Frequently Asked Questions

Is paying a marketing company per new patient always illegal?

When the patient’s care is billed to Medicare, Medi-Cal, or any insurance carrier, per-patient compensation for referrals is exactly what these statutes target. Structuring patient acquisition lawfully requires counsel before the contract is signed.

I received referrals but never paid anyone. Am I still at risk?

Receiving remuneration for referrals is also a crime — both sides of the transaction are charged. If you were offered or accepted anything of value connected to patient flow, get advice before agents raise it first.

What should I do if a business partner proposes a referral arrangement?

Have a healthcare lawyer structure it to a safe harbor before any money moves. Retroactive fixes cannot undo a payment that already occurred.

Official Legal and Agency References

Important Legal Disclaimer

This page is legal information, not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws and enforcement priorities change, and outcomes depend on the facts of each case.


Riverside office: My Rights Law Criminal Defense and DUI Lawyers - Riverside, 3600 Lime St #424, Riverside, CA 92501. Call 888-702-8882 for a free confidential consultation.


This page was written by the My Rights Law Editorial Team and reviewed for legal accuracy by Bobby Shamuilian.

Attorney Shamuilian is the founder and managing partner of My Rights Law and is widely recognized as a legal authority, frequently appearing as a legal analyst and TV pundit on national news outlets.

He has earned a perfect “10.0 – Top Attorney” rating on AVVO and a “10.0” rating on Justia, and has been named among the “Top 40 Under 40” and the “Top 100 Trial Lawyers” by The National Trial Lawyers.

With his proven expertise and dedication, Mr. Shamuilian is committed to protecting your rights and achieving the best possible outcome for your case.

The last modified date shows when this page was most recently reviewed.

schedule a free confidential consultation

Accessibility Toolbar

crosschevron-down