Violating a Restraining Order

What is the Law Prohibiting Violating a Restraining Order in California?

Violating a restraining order is defined in California Penal Code § 273.6.

In order to be found guilty of violating a restraining order, it must be proven that:

  • 1)A Court issued a legal restraining order
  • 2)The defendant knew about the restraining order
  • 3)The defendant intentionally violated the restraining order

What is a Restraining Order?

A restraining order, also known as a protective order, is a document that is issued by a Court in order to protect another individual from certain acts like threats, stalking, and physical abuse. The order is specific in nature and dictates what type of contact is impermissible. The types of restraining orders include:

  • Domestic Violence Restraining Order
  • Civil Harassment Restraining Order
  • Dependent Adult Restraining Order
  • Workplace Violence Restraining Order

Domestic Violence Restraining Order:

Protects individuals from threats, stalking and physical abuse within intimate relationships.

Civil Harassment Restraining Order:

Protects people outside of an intimate relationship, such as neighbors, from threats, stalking, and physical abuse.

Dependent Adult Restraining Order:

Protects individuals who are 65 years of age or older from threats, stalking and physical abuse.

Workplace Violence Retraining Order:

Protects co-workers from threats, stalking and physical violence initiated by another employee.

The types of restraining orders, mentioned above, have different levels of protection. A Permanent Restraining Order is the most strict type of restraining order and provides protection for up to 3 years with a possibility for extension. Both the person seeking the protection as well as the person they are seeking protection from will need to appear before a Judge to determine if this is the type of order that should be granted.

A temporary restraining order is just that – temporary. This type of order can provide protection for as long as 3 weeks and will be issued if the applicant has suffered harassment in the form of violence, or the person the applicant is seeking protection from has exhibited behavior that causes emotional distress.

An emergency restraining order is issued in an emergency situation where an officer of the law feels the need to place a legal, but metaphorical, wall between two people. The order can be issued by a police officer and can last for as long as 7 days.

Court Issue:

If a Court issues a restraining order, the defendant must abide by the parameters as long as the Court that issued the order had the authority to do so.

Knowledge:

If the defendant was named in a restraining order, he or she must be given notice and an opportunity to read the order. The notice may come by way of a Judge in Court; in writing in the form of the person presenting the order to the defendant; or by a police officer called to enforce the original order.

Intent:

To be found guilty of violating a legally issued restraining order, the defendant must have done so intentionally. This means that the defendant must have been aware of the order, what the order protects against, and still chose to perform one of the prohibited acts.

What are the Consequences of a Restraining Order Violation?

Under California law, violating a restraining order is considered to be a misdemeanor which carries penalties of up to 1 year in jail and a fine in excess of $1,000.

However, if the defendant has previously violated the terms of a restraining order within a 7-year period, the most recent violation could rise to the level of a felony. This would mean that the potential penalty would increase to 16 months, 2, or 3 years in prison and a $10,000 fine.

The penalties can increase even further if the violation escalated to the involvement of physical violence. For example, a first-time restraining order violator would face a minimum of 30 days in jail if the violation involved violence. A second-time violator would face a minimum of 6 months in jail.

It is also important to note that it is against California law for a person named in a restraining order to own a firearm. If the defendant does not turn the firearms over to the police and instead knowingly maintains ownership, an additional penalty of up to 1 year in jail and a $1,000 fine.

What are Possible Defenses to Violating a Restraining Order?

There are several legitimate defenses to a charge of violating a restraining order since the requisite elements to be proven are extremely subjective and intent-based. Some examples of those defenses are the following:

Lack of Knowledge: To be found guilty of violating a restraining order, the defendant must have been aware of the order’s existence. This type of defense is successful in situations where the defendant was not present in Court when the order was legally issued. If it can be proven that the defendant never received proper notice of the order’s issue, they cannot be held liable for its violation.

Lack of Truth: When a restraining order is issued, it is usually due to some type of strained relationship. Because of this, a heavy level of bitterness can exist between the two parties. As a result, it is possible that the person that sought the order would want the defendant to violate its terms so that a harsh punishment can be given out.

For example, an order is issued that stipulates that the defendant is not to talk on the phone to the other person. However, the issuing party text messages the defendant telling them that they would like to work their issues out and would like for the defendant to call them later in the day to do so. Because only a judge can lift an order, regardless of the issuing parties consent, the defendant would be found to be in violation of the restraining order if they called the other person later in the day like they were asked. It is possible that the issuing party would claim they never contacted the defendant and that the defendant intended the violation to occur. This type of trick is common and must be cautioned against.

Lack of Intent: To obtain a conviction in a restraining order violation case, it must be proven that the defendant intended to break the terms of the order. For example, if the defendant was ordered not to come within five feet of his spouse but the defendant accidentally runs into his spouse at a local flea market, the defendant cannot be found liable since he did not intend for the run-in to occur.

Click Here to Call for a No Obligation, FREE Strategy Session

We Are
On Your Side

(888) 702-8882

CALL OUR CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS 24/7 OR FILL OUT THIS SECURE FORM TO GET OUR IMMEDIATE ADVICE

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
AS SEEN ON
Testimonials
Bobby Shamuilian was Hands Down the BEST attorney I have ever dealt with. He is an experienced and knowledgeable attorney, who is HONEST and not in it to try and rip you off for the money. His staff is professional and extremely pleasant. I have saved his number in my contacts and will call him if I am EVER in need of an attorney, I would also recommend him to anybody I know, he is an AMAZING attorney.
Annifred F.
An excellent and professional consultation followed by a successful win of my case.
Dan P.
Thank you Kirk. You guys are top notch. Kept me informed on everything that was going on with my case and I didn’t have to show up in court once. Got my case dismissed, now I can move on. I would recommend this law firm to anyone that wants a fair shake.
James
I had a difficult case that I was trying to fight from outside the state it was turned down twice. Once by the DA, and the second time by the judge, they continued to fight for me, and got the results I was looking for. They really do care about their clients and will not stop fighting till they get you the results you want.
Adrian A.
I couldn’t be happier with the service we received. From the very beginning I could tell that these lawyers knew a lot about DUI cases and throughout our court days they went above and beyond to make sure we were prepared for whatever might come our way. They definitely prepare you for the worst but get you the best. They covered every single base and we got an amazing outcome. I would recommend them any day.
Client
I want to thank Bobby, Kirk, and the entire staff. They recalled my warrant and got my case dismissed in no time. They answered my concerns and took me step by step in the process. I didn’t even have to appear in court. They represented me and took care of my case all the way. Thank you!!!
Suriel A.
I would like to thank Mr. Shamuilian and Mr. Tarman for helping me to get a good result for my case. They are very reliable people that kept things very professional. I recommend them strongly, they will help you tremendously. I was very lucky that I had the opportunity to work with such highly skilled people. You won’t regret hiring them, thanks again.
Bachir
Good attorneys are hard to find! Bobby Shamuilian actually represented me with my best interest at heart. He gave it his all and because of that my case is being dismissed today. This firm is most definitely the best one to have if you need a criminal attorney. God forbid I ever need a criminal defense attorney, I would not even consider anyone else to represent me. Absolutely an amazing attorney!!!!! THANK YOU!!!!
Christine
I had the pleasure of working with Kirk, and his office regarding my DUI case. I was originally charged with 2 felony counts (vehicle codes 23153A & 23153B). Kirk’s office was very professional and was able to negotiate with the District Attorney get my conviction reduced to a 1 count misdemeanor. Throughout the whole ordeal of two court dates, he and staff was available for any of my questions and concerns.
Tobias
Everyone in the office was helpful and professional. There was never a time when I thought they weren’t going to be there when we needed them. Their reputation and professionalism was the primary factor for using this law firm. Boy, were we impressed with all of the work they put into our case. Thank you to everyone in the office for always making us feel like we were your only clients!
Neckole S.
I found myself facing a DUI and scared to death. From the very start of the initial consultation, Attorneys Kirk Tarman and Bobby Shamuilian put me at ease. They handled my DMV Hearing and the court proceeding and truly fought for me. They were always attentive to my phone calls and emails, keeping me informed. They were able to get me a reduced charged so that I do not have a DUI on my record. I am so thankful to have retained them for my case.
Blaine
Got my case dropped from a felony to 2 misdemeanors to having everything dismissed. Justice has been served, nothing more I could ask for! Many thanks Patty, Kirk and Bobby!
Rod R.
I was faced with a very serious Felony. A charge that carried jail time, fines, probation and more. I was told by several people that I had an uphill battle. One that I should be very concerned with, and worried about. I was referred to the Law offices of Tarman & Shamuilian. I was represented by Atty. Kirk Tarman who got the case dismissed. Atty. Kirk Tarman is the man. He is truly a Superman of attorneys and, a Superstar. Two thumbs way up.
Stuart T.
I am a person who believes in giving credit where credit is due and I absolutely need to say that Bobby is amazing. The thing that stood out about him initially was that he was actually empathetic and showed compassion about what we were going through… I would absolutely 150% recommend Bobby to any of my friends and family – he is such a genuine guy and knows how to do his job, and do it well.
Bree F.
Bobby Shamuilian got me 1.4 million dollars…just kidding:) He did get my reckless driving traffic violation dismissed without me having to go to court though. The staff at Tarman and Shamuilian are very capable lovely beings… Thank you Bobby can’t tell you how much it means to me man…
Gary D.
San Bernardino Co
Los Angeles Co
Riverside County
Orange County